7
Bounds on codes, special matrices and miscellaneous functions

7.1
Distance bounds on codes

7.1-1 UpperBoundSingleton

7.1-2 UpperBoundHamming

7.1-3 UpperBoundJohnson

7.1-4 UpperBoundPlotkin

7.1-5 UpperBoundElias

7.1-6 UpperBoundGriesmer

7.1-7 IsGriesmerCode

7.1-8 UpperBound

7.1-9 LowerBoundMinimumDistance

7.1-10 LowerBoundGilbertVarshamov

7.1-11 LowerBoundSpherePacking

7.1-12 UpperBoundMinimumDistance

7.1-13 BoundsMinimumDistance

7.1-1 UpperBoundSingleton

7.1-2 UpperBoundHamming

7.1-3 UpperBoundJohnson

7.1-4 UpperBoundPlotkin

7.1-5 UpperBoundElias

7.1-6 UpperBoundGriesmer

7.1-7 IsGriesmerCode

7.1-8 UpperBound

7.1-9 LowerBoundMinimumDistance

7.1-10 LowerBoundGilbertVarshamov

7.1-11 LowerBoundSpherePacking

7.1-12 UpperBoundMinimumDistance

7.1-13 BoundsMinimumDistance

7.2
Covering radius bounds on codes

7.2-1 BoundsCoveringRadius

7.2-2 IncreaseCoveringRadiusLowerBound

7.2-3 ExhaustiveSearchCoveringRadius

7.2-4 GeneralLowerBoundCoveringRadius

7.2-5 GeneralUpperBoundCoveringRadius

7.2-6 LowerBoundCoveringRadiusSphereCovering

7.2-7 LowerBoundCoveringRadiusVanWee1

7.2-8 LowerBoundCoveringRadiusVanWee2

7.2-9 LowerBoundCoveringRadiusCountingExcess

7.2-10 LowerBoundCoveringRadiusEmbedded1

7.2-11 LowerBoundCoveringRadiusEmbedded2

7.2-12 LowerBoundCoveringRadiusInduction

7.2-13 UpperBoundCoveringRadiusRedundancy

7.2-14 UpperBoundCoveringRadiusDelsarte

7.2-15 UpperBoundCoveringRadiusStrength

7.2-16 UpperBoundCoveringRadiusGriesmerLike

7.2-17 UpperBoundCoveringRadiusCyclicCode

7.2-1 BoundsCoveringRadius

7.2-2 IncreaseCoveringRadiusLowerBound

7.2-3 ExhaustiveSearchCoveringRadius

7.2-4 GeneralLowerBoundCoveringRadius

7.2-5 GeneralUpperBoundCoveringRadius

7.2-6 LowerBoundCoveringRadiusSphereCovering

7.2-7 LowerBoundCoveringRadiusVanWee1

7.2-8 LowerBoundCoveringRadiusVanWee2

7.2-9 LowerBoundCoveringRadiusCountingExcess

7.2-10 LowerBoundCoveringRadiusEmbedded1

7.2-11 LowerBoundCoveringRadiusEmbedded2

7.2-12 LowerBoundCoveringRadiusInduction

7.2-13 UpperBoundCoveringRadiusRedundancy

7.2-14 UpperBoundCoveringRadiusDelsarte

7.2-15 UpperBoundCoveringRadiusStrength

7.2-16 UpperBoundCoveringRadiusGriesmerLike

7.2-17 UpperBoundCoveringRadiusCyclicCode

7.5
Miscellaneous functions

7.5-1 CodeWeightEnumerator

7.5-2 CodeDistanceEnumerator

7.5-3 CodeMacWilliamsTransform

7.5-4 CodeDensity

7.5-5 SphereContent

7.5-6 Krawtchouk

7.5-7 PrimitiveUnityRoot

7.5-8 PrimitivePolynomialsNr

7.5-9 IrreduciblePolynomialsNr

7.5-10 MatrixRepresentationOfElement

7.5-11 ReciprocalPolynomial

7.5-12 CyclotomicCosets

7.5-13 WeightHistogram

7.5-14 MultiplicityInList

7.5-15 MostCommonInList

7.5-16 RotateList

7.5-17 CirculantMatrix

7.5-1 CodeWeightEnumerator

7.5-2 CodeDistanceEnumerator

7.5-3 CodeMacWilliamsTransform

7.5-4 CodeDensity

7.5-5 SphereContent

7.5-6 Krawtchouk

7.5-7 PrimitiveUnityRoot

7.5-8 PrimitivePolynomialsNr

7.5-9 IrreduciblePolynomialsNr

7.5-10 MatrixRepresentationOfElement

7.5-11 ReciprocalPolynomial

7.5-12 CyclotomicCosets

7.5-13 WeightHistogram

7.5-14 MultiplicityInList

7.5-15 MostCommonInList

7.5-16 RotateList

7.5-17 CirculantMatrix

7.6
Miscellaneous polynomial functions

7.6-1 MatrixTransformationOnMultivariatePolynomial

7.6-2 DegreeMultivariatePolynomial

7.6-3 DegreesMultivariatePolynomial

7.6-4 CoefficientMultivariatePolynomial

7.6-5 SolveLinearSystem

7.6-6 GuavaVersion

7.6-7 ZechLog

7.6-8 CoefficientToPolynomial

7.6-9 DegreesMonomialTerm

7.6-10 DivisorsMultivariatePolynomial

7.6-1 MatrixTransformationOnMultivariatePolynomial

7.6-2 DegreeMultivariatePolynomial

7.6-3 DegreesMultivariatePolynomial

7.6-4 CoefficientMultivariatePolynomial

7.6-5 SolveLinearSystem

7.6-6 GuavaVersion

7.6-7 ZechLog

7.6-8 CoefficientToPolynomial

7.6-9 DegreesMonomialTerm

7.6-10 DivisorsMultivariatePolynomial

In this chapter we describe functions that determine bounds on the size and minimum distance of codes (Section 7.1), functions that determine bounds on the size and covering radius of codes (Section 7.2), functions that work with special matrices **GUAVA** needs for several codes (see Section 7.3), and constructing codes or performing calculations with codes (see Section 7.5).

This section describes the functions that calculate estimates for upper bounds on the size and minimum distance of codes. Several algorithms are known to compute a largest number of words a code can have with given length and minimum distance. It is important however to understand that in some cases the true upper bound is unknown. A code which has a size equalto the calculated upper bound may not have been found. However, codes that have a larger size do not exist.

A second way to obtain bounds is a table. In **GUAVA**, an extensive table is implemented for linear codes over \(GF(2)\), \(GF(3)\) and \(GF(4)\). It contains bounds on the minimum distance for given word length and dimension. It contains entries for word lengths less than or equal to \(257\), \(243\) and \(256\) for codes over \(GF(2)\), \(GF(3)\) and \(GF(4)\) respectively. These entries were obtained from Brouwer's tables as of 11 May 2006. For the latest information, please see A. E. Brouwer's tables [Bro06] on the internet.

Firstly, we describe functions that compute specific upper bounds on the code size (see `UpperBoundSingleton`

(7.1-1), `UpperBoundHamming`

(7.1-2), `UpperBoundJohnson`

(7.1-3), `UpperBoundPlotkin`

(7.1-4), `UpperBoundElias`

(7.1-5) and `UpperBoundGriesmer`

(7.1-6)).

Next we describe a function that computes **GUAVA**'s best upper bound on the code size (see `UpperBound`

(7.1-8)).

Then we describe two functions that compute a lower and upper bound on the minimum distance of a code (see `LowerBoundMinimumDistance`

(7.1-9) and `UpperBoundMinimumDistance`

(7.1-12)).

Finally, we describe a function that returns a lower and upper bound on the minimum distance with given parameters and a description of how the bounds were obtained (see `BoundsMinimumDistance`

(7.1-13)).

`‣ UpperBoundSingleton` ( n, d, q ) | ( function ) |

`UpperBoundSingleton`

returns the Singleton bound for a code of length `n`, minimum distance `d` over a field of size `q`. This bound is based on the shortening of codes. By shortening an \((n, M, d)\) code \(d-1\) times, an \((n-d+1,M,1)\) code results, with \(M \leq q^{n-d+1}\) (see `ShortenedCode`

(6.1-9)). Thus

\[ M \leq q^{n-d+1}. \]

Codes that meet this bound are called *maximum distance separable* (see `IsMDSCode`

(4.3-7)).

gap> UpperBoundSingleton(4, 3, 5); 25 gap> C := ReedSolomonCode(4,3);; Size(C); 25 gap> IsMDSCode(C); true

`‣ UpperBoundHamming` ( n, d, q ) | ( function ) |

The Hamming bound (also known as the *sphere packing bound*) returns an upper bound on the size of a code of length `n`, minimum distance `d`, over a field of size `q`. The Hamming bound is obtained by dividing the contents of the entire space \(GF(q)^n\) by the contents of a ball with radius \(\lfloor(d-1) / 2\rfloor\). As all these balls are disjoint, they can never contain more than the whole vector space.

\[ M \leq {q^n \over V(n,e)}, \]

where \(M\) is the maxmimum number of codewords and \(V(n,e)\) is equal to the contents of a ball of radius \(e\) (see `SphereContent`

(7.5-5)). This bound is useful for small values of `d`. Codes for which equality holds are called *perfect* (see `IsPerfectCode`

(4.3-6)).

gap> UpperBoundHamming( 15, 3, 2 ); 2048 gap> C := HammingCode( 4, GF(2) ); a linear [15,11,3]1 Hamming (4,2) code over GF(2) gap> Size( C ); 2048

`‣ UpperBoundJohnson` ( n, d ) | ( function ) |

The Johnson bound is an improved version of the Hamming bound (see `UpperBoundHamming`

(7.1-2)). In addition to the Hamming bound, it takes into account the elements of the space outside the balls of radius \(e\) around the elements of the code. The Johnson bound only works for binary codes.

gap> UpperBoundJohnson( 13, 5 ); 77 gap> UpperBoundHamming( 13, 5, 2); 89 # in this case the Johnson bound is better

`‣ UpperBoundPlotkin` ( n, d, q ) | ( function ) |

The function `UpperBoundPlotkin`

calculates the sum of the distances of all ordered pairs of different codewords. It is based on the fact that the minimum distance is at most equal to the average distance. It is a good bound if the weights of the codewords do not differ much. It results in:

\[ M \leq {d \over {d-(1-1/q)n}}, \]

where \(M\) is the maximum number of codewords. In this case, `d` must be larger than \((1-1/q)n\), but by shortening the code, the case \(d \ \ \langle\ \ (1-1/q)n\) is covered.

gap> UpperBoundPlotkin( 15, 7, 2 ); 32 gap> C := BCHCode( 15, 7, GF(2) ); a cyclic [15,5,7]5 BCH code, delta=7, b=1 over GF(2) gap> Size(C); 32 gap> WeightDistribution(C); [ 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 15, 15, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1 ]

`‣ UpperBoundElias` ( n, d, q ) | ( function ) |

The Elias bound is an improvement of the Plotkin bound (see `UpperBoundPlotkin`

(7.1-4)) for large codes. Subcodes are used to decrease the size of the code, in this case the subcode of all codewords within a certain ball. This bound is useful for large codes with relatively small minimum distances.

gap> UpperBoundPlotkin( 16, 3, 2 ); 12288 gap> UpperBoundElias( 16, 3, 2 ); 10280 gap> UpperBoundElias( 20, 10, 3 ); 16255

`‣ UpperBoundGriesmer` ( n, d, q ) | ( function ) |

The Griesmer bound is valid only for linear codes. It is obtained by counting the number of equal symbols in each row of the generator matrix of the code. By omitting the coordinates in which all rows have a zero, a smaller code results. The Griesmer bound is obtained by repeating this proces until a trivial code is left in the end.

gap> UpperBoundGriesmer( 13, 5, 2 ); 64 gap> UpperBoundGriesmer( 18, 9, 2 ); 8 # the maximum number of words for a linear code is 8 gap> Size( PuncturedCode( HadamardCode( 20, 1 ) ) ); 20 # this non-linear code has 20 elements

`‣ IsGriesmerCode` ( C ) | ( function ) |

`IsGriesmerCode`

returns `true' if a linear code `C` is a Griesmer code, and `false' otherwise. A code is called *Griesmer* if its length satisfies

\[ n = g[k,d] = \sum_{i=0}^{k-1} \lceil \frac{d}{q^i} \rceil. \]

gap> IsGriesmerCode( HammingCode( 3, GF(2) ) ); true gap> IsGriesmerCode( BCHCode( 17, 2, GF(2) ) ); false

`‣ UpperBound` ( n, d, q ) | ( function ) |

`UpperBound`

returns the best known upper bound \(A(n,d)\) for the size of a code of length `n`, minimum distance `d` over a field of size `q`. The function `UpperBound`

first checks for trivial cases (like \(d=1\) or \(n=d\)), and if the value is in the built-in table. Then it calculates the minimum value of the upper bound using the methods of Singleton (see `UpperBoundSingleton`

(7.1-1)), Hamming (see `UpperBoundHamming`

(7.1-2)), Johnson (see `UpperBoundJohnson`

(7.1-3)), Plotkin (see `UpperBoundPlotkin`

(7.1-4)) and Elias (see `UpperBoundElias`

(7.1-5)). If the code is binary, \(A(n, 2\cdot \ell-1) = A(n+1,2\cdot \ell)\), so the `UpperBound`

takes the minimum of the values obtained from all methods for the parameters \((n, 2\cdot\ell-1)\) and \((n+1, 2\cdot \ell)\).

gap> UpperBound( 10, 3, 2 ); 85 gap> UpperBound( 25, 9, 8 ); 1211778792827540

`‣ LowerBoundMinimumDistance` ( C ) | ( function ) |

In this form, `LowerBoundMinimumDistance`

returns a lower bound for the minimum distance of code `C`.

This command can also be called using the syntax `LowerBoundMinimumDistance( n, k, F )`

. In this form, `LowerBoundMinimumDistance`

returns a lower bound for the minimum distance of the best known linear code of length `n`, dimension `k` over field `F`. It uses the mechanism explained in section 7.1-13.

gap> C := BCHCode( 45, 7 ); a cyclic [45,23,7..9]6..16 BCH code, delta=7, b=1 over GF(2) gap> LowerBoundMinimumDistance( C ); 7 # designed distance is lower bound for minimum distance gap> LowerBoundMinimumDistance( 45, 23, GF(2) ); 10

`‣ LowerBoundGilbertVarshamov` ( n, d, q ) | ( function ) |

This is the lower bound on the size of a linear code due (independently) to Gilbert and Varshamov. It says that for each `n` and `d`, there exists a linear code having length \(n\) and minimum distance \(d\) at least of size \(q^k\), where \(k\) is the largest integer such that \(q^k < q^{n}/\)`SphereContent`

\((n-1,d-2,GF(q))\).

gap> LowerBoundGilbertVarshamov(24,8,2); 64 gap> LowerBoundGilbertVarshamov(7,3,2); 16 gap> LowerBoundMinimumDistance(7,4,2); 3 gap> LowerBoundGilbertVarshamov(3,3,2); 1 gap> LowerBoundMinimumDistance(3,3,2); 1 gap> LowerBoundGilbertVarshamov(25,10,2); 16

`‣ LowerBoundSpherePacking` ( n, d, q ) | ( function ) |

This is the (weaker) Gilbert-Varshamov bound valid for unrestricted codes over an alphabet of size `q` (where `q` is an integer > 1). It says that for each `n` and `r`, there exists an unrestricted code at least of size \(q^n/\)`SphereContent`

\((n,d,GF(q))\) minimum distance \(d\).

gap> LowerBoundSpherePacking(3,2,2); 2 gap> LowerBoundSpherePacking(3,3,2); 1

`‣ UpperBoundMinimumDistance` ( C ) | ( function ) |

In this form, `UpperBoundMinimumDistance`

returns an upper bound for the minimum distance of code `C`. For unrestricted codes, it just returns the word length. For linear codes, it takes the minimum of the possibly known value from the method of construction, the weight of the generators, and the value from the table (see 7.1-13).

This command can also be called using the syntax `UpperBoundMinimumDistance( n, k, F )`

. In this form, `UpperBoundMinimumDistance`

returns an upper bound for the minimum distance of the best known linear code of length `n`, dimension `k` over field `F`. It uses the mechanism explained in section 7.1-13.

gap> C := BCHCode( 45, 7 );; gap> UpperBoundMinimumDistance( C ); 9 gap> UpperBoundMinimumDistance( 45, 23, GF(2) ); 11

`‣ BoundsMinimumDistance` ( n, k, F ) | ( function ) |

The function `BoundsMinimumDistance`

calculates a lower and upper bound for the minimum distance of an optimal linear code with word length `n`, dimension `k` over field `F`. The function returns a record with the two bounds and an explanation for each bound. The function `Display`

can be used to show the explanations.

The values for the lower and upper bound are obtained from a table. **GUAVA** has tables containing lower and upper bounds for \(q=2 (n \leq 257), 3 (n \leq 243), 4 (n \leq 256)\). (Current as of 11 May 2006.) These tables were derived from the table of Brouwer. (See [Bro06], https://www.codetables.de for the most recent data.) For codes over other fields and for larger word lengths, trivial bounds are used.

The resulting record can be used in the function `BestKnownLinearCode`

(see `BestKnownLinearCode`

(5.2-14)) to construct a code with minimum distance equal to the lower bound.

gap> bounds := BoundsMinimumDistance( 7, 3 );; DisplayBoundsInfo( bounds ); an optimal linear [7,3,d] code over GF(2) has d=4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lb(7,3)=4, by shortening of: Lb(8,4)=4, u u+v construction of C1 and C2: Lb(4,3)=2, dual of the repetition code Lb(4,1)=4, repetition code ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ub(7,3)=4, Griesmer bound # The lower bound is equal to the upper bound, so a code with # these parameters is optimal. gap> C := BestKnownLinearCode( bounds );; Display( C ); a linear [7,3,4]2..3 shortened code of a linear [8,4,4]2 U U+V construction code of U: a cyclic [4,3,2]1 dual code of a cyclic [4,1,4]2 repetition code over GF(2) V: a cyclic [4,1,4]2 repetition code over GF(2)

`‣ BoundsCoveringRadius` ( C ) | ( function ) |

`BoundsCoveringRadius`

returns a list of integers. The first entry of this list is the maximum of some lower bounds for the covering radius of `C`, the last entry the minimum of some upper bounds of `C`.

If the covering radius of `C` is known, a list of length 1 is returned. `BoundsCoveringRadius`

makes use of the functions `GeneralLowerBoundCoveringRadius`

and `GeneralUpperBoundCoveringRadius`

.

gap> BoundsCoveringRadius( BCHCode( 17, 3, GF(2) ) ); [ 3 .. 4 ] gap> BoundsCoveringRadius( HammingCode( 5, GF(2) ) ); [ 1 ]

`‣ IncreaseCoveringRadiusLowerBound` ( C[, stopdist][, startword] ) | ( function ) |

`IncreaseCoveringRadiusLowerBound`

tries to increase the lower bound of the covering radius of `C`. It does this by means of a probabilistic algorithm. This algorithm takes a random word in \(GF(q)^n\) (or `startword` if it is specified), and, by changing random coordinates, tries to get as far from `C` as possible. If changing a coordinate finds a word that has a larger distance to the code than the previous one, the change is made permanent, and the algorithm starts all over again. If changing a coordinate does not find a coset leader that is further away from the code, then the change is made permanent with a chance of 1 in 100, if it gets the word closer to the code, or with a chance of 1 in 10, if the word stays at the same distance. Otherwise, the algorithm starts again with the same word as before.

If the algorithm did not allow changes that decrease the distance to the code, it might get stuck in a sub-optimal situation (the coset leader corresponding to such a situation - i.e. no coordinate of this coset leader can be changed in such a way that we get at a larger distance from the code - is called an *orphan*).

If the algorithm finds a word that has distance `stopdist` to the code, it ends and returns that word, which can be used for further investigations.

The variable `InfoCoveringRadius` can be set to `Print` to print the maximum distance reached so far every 1000 runs. The algorithm can be interrupted with **ctrl-C**, allowing the user to look at the word that is currently being examined (called `current'), or to change the chances that the new word is made permanent (these are called `staychance' and `downchance'). If one of these variables is \(i\), then it corresponds with a \(i\) in 100 chance.

At the moment, the algorithm is only useful for codes with small dimension, where small means that the elements of the code fit in the memory. It works with larger codes, however, but when you use it for codes with large dimension, you should be *very* patient. If running the algorithm quits GAP (due to memory problems), you can change the global variable `CRMemSize` to a lower value. This might cause the algorithm to run slower, but without quitting GAP. The only way to find out the best value of `CRMemSize` is by experimenting.

gap> C:=RandomLinearCode(10,5,GF(2)); a [10,5,?] randomly generated code over GF(2) gap> IncreaseCoveringRadiusLowerBound(C,10); Number of runs: 1000 best distance so far: 3 Number of runs: 2000 best distance so far: 3 Number of changes: 100 Number of runs: 3000 best distance so far: 3 Number of runs: 4000 best distance so far: 3 Number of runs: 5000 best distance so far: 3 Number of runs: 6000 best distance so far: 3 Number of runs: 7000 best distance so far: 3 Number of changes: 200 Number of runs: 8000 best distance so far: 3 Number of runs: 9000 best distance so far: 3 Number of runs: 10000 best distance so far: 3 Number of changes: 300 Number of runs: 11000 best distance so far: 3 Number of runs: 12000 best distance so far: 3 Number of runs: 13000 best distance so far: 3 Number of changes: 400 Number of runs: 14000 best distance so far: 3 user interrupt at... # # used ctrl-c to break out of execution # ... called from IncreaseCoveringRadiusLowerBound( code, -1, current ) called from function( arguments ) called from read-eval-loop Entering break read-eval-print loop ... you can 'quit;' to quit to outer loop, or you can 'return;' to continue brk> current; [ Z(2)^0, Z(2)^0, Z(2)^0, Z(2)^0, 0*Z(2), Z(2)^0, 0*Z(2), Z(2)^0, 0*Z(2), Z(2)^0 ] brk> gap> CoveringRadius(C); 3

`‣ ExhaustiveSearchCoveringRadius` ( C ) | ( function ) |

`ExhaustiveSearchCoveringRadius`

does an exhaustive search to find the covering radius of `C`. Every time a coset leader of a coset with weight \(w\) is found, the function tries to find a coset leader of a coset with weight \(w+1\). It does this by enumerating all words of weight \(w+1\), and checking whether a word is a coset leader. The start weight is the current known lower bound on the covering radius.

gap> C:=RandomLinearCode(10,5,GF(2)); a [10,5,?] randomly generated code over GF(2) gap> ExhaustiveSearchCoveringRadius(C); Trying 3 ... [ 3 .. 5 ] gap> CoveringRadius(C); 3

`‣ GeneralLowerBoundCoveringRadius` ( C ) | ( function ) |

`GeneralLowerBoundCoveringRadius`

returns a lower bound on the covering radius of `C`. It uses as many functions which names start with `LowerBoundCoveringRadius`

as possible to find the best known lower bound (at least that **GUAVA** knows of) together with tables for the covering radius of binary linear codes with length not greater than \(64\).

gap> C:=RandomLinearCode(10,5,GF(2)); a [10,5,?] randomly generated code over GF(2) gap> GeneralLowerBoundCoveringRadius(C); 2 gap> CoveringRadius(C); 3

`‣ GeneralUpperBoundCoveringRadius` ( C ) | ( function ) |

`GeneralUpperBoundCoveringRadius`

returns an upper bound on the covering radius of `C`. It uses as many functions which names start with `UpperBoundCoveringRadius`

as possible to find the best known upper bound (at least that **GUAVA** knows of).

gap> C:=RandomLinearCode(10,5,GF(2)); a [10,5,?] randomly generated code over GF(2) gap> GeneralUpperBoundCoveringRadius(C); 4 gap> CoveringRadius(C); 3

`‣ LowerBoundCoveringRadiusSphereCovering` ( n, M[, F], false ) | ( function ) |

This command can also be called using the syntax `LowerBoundCoveringRadiusSphereCovering( n, r, [F,] true )`

. If the last argument of `LowerBoundCoveringRadiusSphereCovering`

is `false`, then it returns a lower bound for the covering radius of a code of size `M` and length `n`. Otherwise, it returns a lower bound for the size of a code of length `n` and covering radius `r`.

`F` is the field over which the code is defined. If `F` is omitted, it is assumed that the code is over \(GF(2)\). The bound is computed according to the sphere covering bound:

\[ M \cdot V_q(n,r) \geq q^n \]

where \(V_q(n,r)\) is the size of a sphere of radius \(r\) in \(GF(q)^n\).

gap> C:=RandomLinearCode(10,5,GF(2)); a [10,5,?] randomly generated code over GF(2) gap> Size(C); 32 gap> CoveringRadius(C); 3 gap> LowerBoundCoveringRadiusSphereCovering(10,32,GF(2),false); 2 gap> LowerBoundCoveringRadiusSphereCovering(10,3,GF(2),true); 6

`‣ LowerBoundCoveringRadiusVanWee1` ( n, M[, F], false ) | ( function ) |

This command can also be called using the syntax `LowerBoundCoveringRadiusVanWee1( n, r, [F,] true )`

. If the last argument of `LowerBoundCoveringRadiusVanWee1`

is `false`, then it returns a lower bound for the covering radius of a code of size `M` and length `n`. Otherwise, it returns a lower bound for the size of a code of length `n` and covering radius `r`.

`F` is the field over which the code is defined. If `F` is omitted, it is assumed that the code is over \(GF(2)\).

The Van Wee bound is an improvement of the sphere covering bound:

\[ M \cdot \left\{ V_q(n,r) - \frac{{n \choose r}}{\lceil\frac{n-r}{r+1}\rceil} \left(\left\lceil\frac{n+1}{r+1}\right\rceil - \frac{n+1}{r+1}\right) \right\} \geq q^n \]

gap> C:=RandomLinearCode(10,5,GF(2)); a [10,5,?] randomly generated code over GF(2) gap> Size(C); 32 gap> CoveringRadius(C); 3 gap> LowerBoundCoveringRadiusVanWee1(10,32,GF(2),false); 2 gap> LowerBoundCoveringRadiusVanWee1(10,3,GF(2),true); 6

`‣ LowerBoundCoveringRadiusVanWee2` ( n, M, false ) | ( function ) |

This command can also be called using the syntax `LowerBoundCoveringRadiusVanWee2( n, r [,true] )`

. If the last argument of `LowerBoundCoveringRadiusVanWee2`

is `false`, then it returns a lower bound for the covering radius of a code of size `M` and length `n`. Otherwise, it returns a lower bound for the size of a code of length `n` and covering radius `r`.

This bound only works for binary codes. It is based on the following inequality:

\[ M \cdot \frac{\left( \left( V_2(n,2) - \frac{1}{2}(r+2)(r-1) \right) V_2(n,r) + \varepsilon V_2(n,r-2) \right)} {(V_2(n,2) - \frac{1}{2}(r+2)(r-1) + \varepsilon)} \geq 2^n, \]

where

\[ \varepsilon = {r+2 \choose 2} \left\lceil {n-r+1 \choose 2} / {r+2 \choose 2} \right\rceil - {n-r+1 \choose 2}. \]

gap> C:=RandomLinearCode(10,5,GF(2)); a [10,5,?] randomly generated code over GF(2) gap> Size(C); 32 gap> CoveringRadius(C); 3 gap> LowerBoundCoveringRadiusVanWee2(10,32,false); 2 gap> LowerBoundCoveringRadiusVanWee2(10,3,true); 7

`‣ LowerBoundCoveringRadiusCountingExcess` ( n, M, false ) | ( function ) |

This command can also be called with `LowerBoundCoveringRadiusCountingExcess( n, r [,true] )`

. If the last argument of `LowerBoundCoveringRadiusCountingExcess`

is `false`, then it returns a lower bound for the covering radius of a code of size `M` and length `n`. Otherwise, it returns a lower bound for the size of a code of length `n` and covering radius `r`.

This bound only works for binary codes. It is based on the following inequality:

\[ M \cdot \left( \rho V_2(n,r) + \varepsilon V_2(n,r-1) \right) \geq (\rho + \varepsilon) 2^n, \]

where

\[ \varepsilon = (r+1) \left\lceil\frac{n+1}{r+1}\right\rceil - (n+1) \]

and

\[ \rho = \left\{ \begin{array}{l} n-3+\frac{2}{n}, \ \ \ \ \ \ {\rm if}\ r = 2\\ n-r-1 , \ \ \ \ \ \ {\rm if}\ r \geq 3 . \end{array} \right. \]

gap> C:=RandomLinearCode(10,5,GF(2)); a [10,5,?] randomly generated code over GF(2) gap> Size(C); 32 gap> CoveringRadius(C); 3 gap> LowerBoundCoveringRadiusCountingExcess(10,32,false); 0 gap> LowerBoundCoveringRadiusCountingExcess(10,3,true); 7

`‣ LowerBoundCoveringRadiusEmbedded1` ( n, M, false ) | ( function ) |

This command can also be called with `LowerBoundCoveringRadiusEmbedded1( n, r [,true] )`

. If the last argument of `LowerBoundCoveringRadiusEmbedded1`

is 'false', then it returns a lower bound for the covering radius of a code of size `M` and length `n`. Otherwise, it returns a lower bound for the size of a code of length `n` and covering radius `r`.

This bound only works for binary codes. It is based on the following inequality:

\[ M \cdot \left( V_2(n,r) - {2r \choose r} \right) \geq 2^n - A( n, 2r+1 ) {2r \choose r}, \]

where \(A(n,d)\) denotes the maximal cardinality of a (binary) code of length \(n\) and minimum distance \(d\). The function `UpperBound`

is used to compute this value.

Sometimes `LowerBoundCoveringRadiusEmbedded1`

is better than `LowerBoundCoveringRadiusEmbedded2`

, sometimes it is the other way around.

gap> C:=RandomLinearCode(10,5,GF(2)); a [10,5,?] randomly generated code over GF(2) gap> Size(C); 32 gap> CoveringRadius(C); 3 gap> LowerBoundCoveringRadiusEmbedded1(10,32,false); 2 gap> LowerBoundCoveringRadiusEmbedded1(10,3,true); 7

`‣ LowerBoundCoveringRadiusEmbedded2` ( n, M, false ) | ( function ) |

This command can also be called with `LowerBoundCoveringRadiusEmbedded2( n, r [,true] )`

. If the last argument of `LowerBoundCoveringRadiusEmbedded2`

is 'false', then it returns a lower bound for the covering radius of a code of size `M` and length `n`. Otherwise, it returns a lower bound for the size of a code of length `n` and covering radius `r`.

This bound only works for binary codes. It is based on the following inequality:

\[ M \cdot \left( V_2(n,r) - \frac{3}{2} {2r \choose r} \right) \geq 2^n - 2A( n, 2r+1 ) {2r \choose r}, \]

where \(A(n,d)\) denotes the maximal cardinality of a (binary) code of length \(n\) and minimum distance \(d\). The function `UpperBound`

is used to compute this value.

Sometimes `LowerBoundCoveringRadiusEmbedded1`

is better than `LowerBoundCoveringRadiusEmbedded2`

, sometimes it is the other way around.

gap> C:=RandomLinearCode(15,5,GF(2)); a [15,5,?] randomly generated code over GF(2) gap> Size(C); 32 gap> CoveringRadius(C); 6 gap> LowerBoundCoveringRadiusEmbedded2(10,32,false); 2 gap> LowerBoundCoveringRadiusEmbedded2(10,3,true); 7

`‣ LowerBoundCoveringRadiusInduction` ( n, r ) | ( function ) |

`LowerBoundCoveringRadiusInduction`

returns a lower bound for the size of a code with length `n` and covering radius `r`.

If \(n = 2r+2\) and \(r \geq 1\), the returned value is \(4\).

If \(n = 2r+3\) and \(r \geq 1\), the returned value is \(7\).

If \(n = 2r+4\) and \(r \geq 4\), the returned value is \(8\).

Otherwise, \(0\) is returned.

gap> C:=RandomLinearCode(15,5,GF(2)); a [15,5,?] randomly generated code over GF(2) gap> CoveringRadius(C); 5 gap> LowerBoundCoveringRadiusInduction(15,6); 7

`‣ UpperBoundCoveringRadiusRedundancy` ( C ) | ( function ) |

`UpperBoundCoveringRadiusRedundancy`

returns the redundancy of `C` as an upper bound for the covering radius of `C`. `C` must be a linear code.

gap> C:=RandomLinearCode(15,5,GF(2)); a [15,5,?] randomly generated code over GF(2) gap> CoveringRadius(C); 5 gap> UpperBoundCoveringRadiusRedundancy(C); 10

`‣ UpperBoundCoveringRadiusDelsarte` ( C ) | ( function ) |

`UpperBoundCoveringRadiusDelsarte`

returns an upper bound for the covering radius of `C`. This upper bound is equal to the external distance of `C`, this is the minimum distance of the dual code, if `C` is a linear code.

This is described in Theorem 11.3.3 of [HP03].

gap> C:=RandomLinearCode(15,5,GF(2)); a [15,5,?] randomly generated code over GF(2) gap> CoveringRadius(C); 5 gap> UpperBoundCoveringRadiusDelsarte(C); 13

`‣ UpperBoundCoveringRadiusStrength` ( C ) | ( function ) |

`UpperBoundCoveringRadiusStrength`

returns an upper bound for the covering radius of `C`.

First the code is punctured at the zero coordinates (i.e. the coordinates where all codewords have a zero). If the remaining code has *strength* 1 (i.e. each coordinate contains each element of the field an equal number of times), then it returns \(\frac{q-1}{q}m + (n-m)\) (where \(q\) is the size of the field and \(m\) is the length of punctured code), otherwise it returns \(n\). This bound works for all codes.

gap> C:=RandomLinearCode(15,5,GF(2)); a [15,5,?] randomly generated code over GF(2) gap> CoveringRadius(C); 5 gap> UpperBoundCoveringRadiusStrength(C); 7

`‣ UpperBoundCoveringRadiusGriesmerLike` ( C ) | ( function ) |

This function returns an upper bound for the covering radius of `C`, which must be linear, in a Griesmer-like fashion. It returns

\[ n - \sum_{i=1}^k \left\lceil \frac{d}{q^i} \right\rceil \]

gap> C:=RandomLinearCode(15,5,GF(2)); a [15,5,?] randomly generated code over GF(2) gap> CoveringRadius(C); 5 gap> UpperBoundCoveringRadiusGriesmerLike(C); 9

`‣ UpperBoundCoveringRadiusCyclicCode` ( C ) | ( function ) |

This function returns an upper bound for the covering radius of `C`, which must be a cyclic code. It returns

\[ n - k + 1 - \left\lceil \frac{w(g(x))}{2} \right\rceil, \]

where \(g(x)\) is the generator polynomial of `C`.

gap> C:=CyclicCodes(15,GF(2))[3]; a cyclic [15,12,1..2]1..3 enumerated code over GF(2) gap> CoveringRadius(C); 3 gap> UpperBoundCoveringRadiusCyclicCode(C); 3

This section explains functions that work with special matrices **GUAVA** needs for several codes.

Firstly, we describe some matrix generating functions (see `KrawtchoukMat`

(7.3-1), `GrayMat`

(7.3-2), `SylvesterMat`

(7.3-3), `HadamardMat`

(7.3-4) and `MOLS`

(7.3-11)).

Next we describe two functions regarding a standard form of matrices (see `PutStandardForm`

(7.3-6) and `IsInStandardForm`

(7.3-7)).

Then we describe functions that return a matrix after a manipulation (see `PermutedCols`

(7.3-8), `VerticalConversionFieldMat`

(7.3-9) and `HorizontalConversionFieldMat`

(7.3-10)).

Finally, we describe functions that do some tests on matrices (see `IsLatinSquare`

(7.3-12) and `AreMOLS`

(7.3-13)).

`‣ KrawtchoukMat` ( n, q ) | ( function ) |

`KrawtchoukMat`

returns the \(n+1\) by \(n+1\) matrix \(K=(k_{ij})\) defined by \(k_{ij}=K_i(j)\) for \(i,j=0,...,n\). \(K_i(j)\) is the Krawtchouk number (see `Krawtchouk`

(7.5-6)). `n` must be a positive integer and `q` a prime power. The Krawtchouk matrix is used in the *MacWilliams identities*, defining the relation between the weight distribution of a code of length `n` over a field of size `q`, and its dual code. Each call to `KrawtchoukMat`

returns a new matrix, so it is safe to modify the result.

gap> PrintArray( KrawtchoukMat( 3, 2 ) ); [ [ 1, 1, 1, 1 ], [ 3, 1, -1, -3 ], [ 3, -1, -1, 3 ], [ 1, -1, 1, -1 ] ] gap> C := HammingCode( 3 );; a := WeightDistribution( C ); [ 1, 0, 0, 7, 7, 0, 0, 1 ] gap> n := WordLength( C );; q := Size( LeftActingDomain( C ) );; gap> k := Dimension( C );; gap> q^( -k ) * KrawtchoukMat( n, q ) * a; [ 1, 0, 0, 0, 7, 0, 0, 0 ] gap> WeightDistribution( DualCode( C ) ); [ 1, 0, 0, 0, 7, 0, 0, 0 ]

`‣ GrayMat` ( n, F ) | ( function ) |

`GrayMat`

returns a list of all different vectors (see GAP's `Vectors`

command) of length `n` over the field `F`, using Gray ordering. `n` must be a positive integer. This order has the property that subsequent vectors differ in exactly one coordinate. The first vector is always the null vector. Each call to `GrayMat`

returns a new matrix, so it is safe to modify the result.

gap> GrayMat(3); [ [ 0*Z(2), 0*Z(2), 0*Z(2) ], [ 0*Z(2), 0*Z(2), Z(2)^0 ], [ 0*Z(2), Z(2)^0, Z(2)^0 ], [ 0*Z(2), Z(2)^0, 0*Z(2) ], [ Z(2)^0, Z(2)^0, 0*Z(2) ], [ Z(2)^0, Z(2)^0, Z(2)^0 ], [ Z(2)^0, 0*Z(2), Z(2)^0 ], [ Z(2)^0, 0*Z(2), 0*Z(2) ] ] gap> G := GrayMat( 4, GF(4) );; Length(G); 256 # the length of a GrayMat is always q^n gap> G[101] - G[100]; [ 0*Z(2), 0*Z(2), Z(2)^0, 0*Z(2) ]

`‣ SylvesterMat` ( n ) | ( function ) |

`SylvesterMat`

returns the \(n\times n\) Sylvester matrix of order `n`. This is a special case of the Hadamard matrices (see `HadamardMat`

(7.3-4)). For this construction, `n` must be a power of \(2\). Each call to `SylvesterMat`

returns a new matrix, so it is safe to modify the result.

gap> PrintArray(SylvesterMat(2)); [ [ 1, 1 ], [ 1, -1 ] ] gap> PrintArray( SylvesterMat(4) ); [ [ 1, 1, 1, 1 ], [ 1, -1, 1, -1 ], [ 1, 1, -1, -1 ], [ 1, -1, -1, 1 ] ]

`‣ HadamardMat` ( n ) | ( function ) |

`HadamardMat`

returns a Hadamard matrix of order `n`. This is an \(n\times n\) matrix with the property that the matrix multiplied by its transpose returns `n` times the identity matrix. This is only possible for \(n=1, n=2\) or in cases where `n` is a multiple of \(4\). If the matrix does not exist or is not known (as of 1998), `HadamardMat`

returns an error. A large number of construction methods is known to create these matrices for different orders. `HadamardMat`

makes use of two construction methods (the Paley Type I and II constructions, and the Sylvester construction -- see `SylvesterMat`

(7.3-3)). These methods cover most of the possible Hadamard matrices, although some special algorithms have not been implemented yet. The following orders less than \(100\) do not yet have an implementation for a Hadamard matrix in **GUAVA**: \(52, 92\).

gap> C := HadamardMat(8);; PrintArray(C); [ [ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 ], [ 1, -1, 1, -1, 1, -1, 1, -1 ], [ 1, 1, -1, -1, 1, 1, -1, -1 ], [ 1, -1, -1, 1, 1, -1, -1, 1 ], [ 1, 1, 1, 1, -1, -1, -1, -1 ], [ 1, -1, 1, -1, -1, 1, -1, 1 ], [ 1, 1, -1, -1, -1, -1, 1, 1 ], [ 1, -1, -1, 1, -1, 1, 1, -1 ] ] gap> C * TransposedMat(C) = 8 * IdentityMat( 8, 8 ); true

`‣ VandermondeMat` ( X, a ) | ( function ) |

The function `VandermondeMat`

returns the \((a+1)\times n\) matrix of powers \(x_i^j\) where `X` is a list of elements of a field, \(X=\{ x_1,...,x_n\}\), and `a` is a non-negative integer.

gap> M:=VandermondeMat([Z(5),Z(5)^2,Z(5)^0,Z(5)^3],2); [ [ Z(5)^0, Z(5), Z(5)^2 ], [ Z(5)^0, Z(5)^2, Z(5)^0 ], [ Z(5)^0, Z(5)^0, Z(5)^0 ], [ Z(5)^0, Z(5)^3, Z(5)^2 ] ] gap> Display(M); 1 2 4 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 3 4

`‣ PutStandardForm` ( M[, idleft] ) | ( function ) |

We say that a \(k\times n\) matrix is in *standard form* if it is equal to the block matrix \((I\ |\ A)\), for some \(k\times (n-k)\) matrix \(A\) and where \(I\) is the \(k\times k\) identity matrix. It follows from a basis result in linear algebra that, after a possible permutation of the columns, using elementary row operations, every matrix can be reduced to standard form. `PutStandardForm`

puts a matrix `M` in standard form, and returns the permutation needed to do so. `idleft` is a boolean that sets the position of the identity matrix in `M`. (The default for `idleft` is `true'.) If `idleft` is set to `true', the identity matrix is put on the left side of `M`. Otherwise, it is put at the right side. (This option is useful when putting a check matrix of a code into standard form.) The function `BaseMat`

also returns a similar standard form, but does not apply column permutations. The rows of the matrix still span the same vector space after `BaseMat`

, but after calling `PutStandardForm`

, this is not necessarily true.

gap> M := Z(2)*[[1,0,0,1],[0,0,1,1]];; PrintArray(M); [ [ Z(2), 0*Z(2), 0*Z(2), Z(2) ], [ 0*Z(2), 0*Z(2), Z(2), Z(2) ] ] gap> PutStandardForm(M); # identity at the left side (2,3) gap> PrintArray(M); [ [ Z(2), 0*Z(2), 0*Z(2), Z(2) ], [ 0*Z(2), Z(2), 0*Z(2), Z(2) ] ] gap> PutStandardForm(M, false); # identity at the right side (1,4,3) gap> PrintArray(M); [ [ 0*Z(2), Z(2), Z(2), 0*Z(2) ], [ 0*Z(2), Z(2), 0*Z(2), Z(2) ] ] gap> C := BestKnownLinearCode( 23, 12, GF(2) ); a linear [23,12,7]3 punctured code gap> G:=MutableCopyMat(GeneratorMat(C));; gap> PutStandardForm(G); () gap> Display(G); 1 . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . 1 . 1 1 1 . . . 1 . 1 . . . . . . . . . . 1 1 1 1 1 . . 1 . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . 1 1 . 1 . . 1 . 1 . 1 . . . 1 . . . . . . . . 1 1 . . . 1 1 1 . 1 . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . 1 1 . . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . 1 1 . . 1 1 . 1 1 1 . . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . 1 1 . . 1 1 . 1 1 . . . . . . . 1 . . . . 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 1 . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . 1 . 1 1 1 . . . 1 1 1 . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . 1 . 1 1 1 . . . 1 1

`‣ IsInStandardForm` ( M[, idleft] ) | ( function ) |

`IsInStandardForm`

determines if `M` is in standard form. `idleft` is a boolean that indicates the position of the identity matrix in `M`, as in `PutStandardForm`

(see `PutStandardForm`

(7.3-6)). `IsInStandardForm`

checks if the identity matrix is at the left side of `M`, otherwise if it is at the right side. The elements of `M` may be elements of any field.

gap> IsInStandardForm(IdentityMat(7, GF(2))); true gap> IsInStandardForm([[1, 1, 0], [1, 0, 1]], false); true gap> IsInStandardForm([[1, 3, 2, 7]]); true gap> IsInStandardForm(HadamardMat(4)); false

`‣ PermutedCols` ( M, P ) | ( function ) |

`PermutedCols`

returns a matrix `M` with a permutation `P` applied to its columns.

gap> M := [[1,2,3,4],[1,2,3,4]];; PrintArray(M); [ [ 1, 2, 3, 4 ], [ 1, 2, 3, 4 ] ] gap> PrintArray(PermutedCols(M, (1,2,3))); [ [ 3, 1, 2, 4 ], [ 3, 1, 2, 4 ] ]

`‣ VerticalConversionFieldMat` ( M, F ) | ( function ) |

`VerticalConversionFieldMat`

returns the matrix `M` with its elements converted from a field \(F=GF(q^m)\), \(q\) prime, to a field \(GF(q)\). Each element is replaced by its representation over the latter field, placed vertically in the matrix, using the \(GF(p)\)-vector space isomorphism

\[ [...] : GF(q)\rightarrow GF(p)^m, \]

with \(q=p^m\).

If `M` is a \(k\) by \(n\) matrix, the result is a \(k\cdot m \times n\) matrix, since each element of \(GF(q^m)\) can be represented in \(GF(q)\) using \(m\) elements.

gap> M := Z(9)*[[1,2],[2,1]];; PrintArray(M); [ [ Z(3^2), Z(3^2)^5 ], [ Z(3^2)^5, Z(3^2) ] ] gap> DefaultField( Flat(M) ); GF(3^2) gap> VCFM := VerticalConversionFieldMat( M, GF(9) );; PrintArray(VCFM); [ [ 0*Z(3), 0*Z(3) ], [ Z(3)^0, Z(3) ], [ 0*Z(3), 0*Z(3) ], [ Z(3), Z(3)^0 ] ] gap> DefaultField( Flat(VCFM) ); GF(3)

A similar function is `HorizontalConversionFieldMat`

(see `HorizontalConversionFieldMat`

(7.3-10)).

`‣ HorizontalConversionFieldMat` ( M, F ) | ( function ) |

`HorizontalConversionFieldMat`

returns the matrix `M` with its elements converted from a field \(F=GF(q^m)\), \(q\) prime, to a field \(GF(q)\). Each element is replaced by its representation over the latter field, placed horizontally in the matrix.

If `M` is a \(k \times n\) matrix, the result is a \(k\times m\times n\cdot m\) matrix. The new word length of the resulting code is equal to \(n\cdot m\), because each element of \(GF(q^m)\) can be represented in \(GF(q)\) using \(m\) elements. The new dimension is equal to \(k\times m\) because the new matrix should be a basis for the same number of vectors as the old one.

`ConversionFieldCode`

uses horizontal conversion to convert a code (see `ConversionFieldCode`

(6.1-15)).

gap> M := Z(9)*[[1,2],[2,1]];; PrintArray(M); [ [ Z(3^2), Z(3^2)^5 ], [ Z(3^2)^5, Z(3^2) ] ] gap> DefaultField( Flat(M) ); GF(3^2) gap> HCFM := HorizontalConversionFieldMat(M, GF(9));; PrintArray(HCFM); [ [ 0*Z(3), Z(3)^0, 0*Z(3), Z(3) ], [ Z(3)^0, Z(3)^0, Z(3), Z(3) ], [ 0*Z(3), Z(3), 0*Z(3), Z(3)^0 ], [ Z(3), Z(3), Z(3)^0, Z(3)^0 ] ] gap> DefaultField( Flat(HCFM) ); GF(3)

A similar function is `VerticalConversionFieldMat`

(see `VerticalConversionFieldMat`

(7.3-9)).

`‣ MOLS` ( q[, n] ) | ( function ) |

`MOLS`

returns a list of `n` *Mutually Orthogonal Latin Squares* (MOLS). A *Latin square* of order `q` is a \(q\times q\) matrix whose entries are from a set \(F_{q}\) of `q` distinct symbols (**GUAVA** uses the integers from \(0\) to `q`) such that each row and each column of the matrix contains each symbol exactly once.

A set of Latin squares is a set of MOLS if and only if for each pair of Latin squares in this set, every ordered pair of elements that are in the same position in these matrices occurs exactly once.

`n` must be less than `q`. If `n` is omitted, two MOLS are returned. If `q` is not a prime power, at most \(2\) MOLS can be created. For all values of `q` with \(q > 2\) and \(q \neq 6\), a list of MOLS can be constructed. However, **GUAVA** does not yet construct MOLS for \(q\equiv 2 \pmod 4\). If it is not possible to construct `n` MOLS, the function returns `false'.

MOLS are used to create `q`-ary codes (see `MOLSCode`

(5.1-4)).

gap> M := MOLS( 4, 3 );;PrintArray( M[1] ); [ [ 0, 1, 2, 3 ], [ 1, 0, 3, 2 ], [ 2, 3, 0, 1 ], [ 3, 2, 1, 0 ] ] gap> PrintArray( M[2] ); [ [ 0, 2, 3, 1 ], [ 1, 3, 2, 0 ], [ 2, 0, 1, 3 ], [ 3, 1, 0, 2 ] ] gap> PrintArray( M[3] ); [ [ 0, 3, 1, 2 ], [ 1, 2, 0, 3 ], [ 2, 1, 3, 0 ], [ 3, 0, 2, 1 ] ] gap> MOLS( 12, 3 ); false

`‣ IsLatinSquare` ( M ) | ( function ) |

`IsLatinSquare`

determines if a matrix `M` is a Latin square. For a Latin square of size \(n\times n\), each row and each column contains all the integers \(1,\dots,n\) exactly once.

gap> IsLatinSquare([[1,2],[2,1]]); true gap> IsLatinSquare([[1,2,3],[2,3,1],[1,3,2]]); false

`‣ AreMOLS` ( L ) | ( function ) |

`AreMOLS`

determines if `L` is a list of mutually orthogonal Latin squares (MOLS). For each pair of Latin squares in this list, the function checks if each ordered pair of elements that are in the same position in these matrices occurs exactly once. The function `MOLS`

creates MOLS (see `MOLS`

(7.3-11)).

gap> M := MOLS(4,2); [ [ [ 0, 1, 2, 3 ], [ 1, 0, 3, 2 ], [ 2, 3, 0, 1 ], [ 3, 2, 1, 0 ] ], [ [ 0, 2, 3, 1 ], [ 1, 3, 2, 0 ], [ 2, 0, 1, 3 ], [ 3, 1, 0, 2 ] ] ] gap> AreMOLS(M); true

In this section, some functions that can be used to compute the norm of a code and to decide upon its normality are discussed. Typically, these are applied to binary linear codes. The definitions of this section were introduced in Graham and Sloane [GS85].

`‣ CoordinateNorm` ( C, coord ) | ( function ) |

`CoordinateNorm`

returns the norm of `C` with respect to coordinate `coord`. If \(C_a = \{ c \in C \ |\ c_{coord} = a \}\), then the norm of `C` with respect to `coord` is defined as

\[ \max_{v \in GF(q)^n} \sum_{a=1}^q d(x,C_a), \]

with the convention that \(d(x,C_a) = n\) if \(C_a\) is empty.

gap> CoordinateNorm( HammingCode( 3, GF(2) ), 3 ); 3

`‣ CodeNorm` ( C ) | ( function ) |

`CodeNorm`

returns the norm of `C`. The *norm* of a code is defined as the minimum of the norms for the respective coordinates of the code. In effect, for each coordinate `CoordinateNorm`

is called, and the minimum of the calculated numbers is returned.

gap> CodeNorm( HammingCode( 3, GF(2) ) ); 3

`‣ IsCoordinateAcceptable` ( C, coord ) | ( function ) |

`IsCoordinateAcceptable`

returns `true' if coordinate `coord` of `C` is acceptable. A coordinate is called *acceptable* if the norm of the code with respect to that coordinate is not more than two times the covering radius of the code plus one.

gap> IsCoordinateAcceptable( HammingCode( 3, GF(2) ), 3 ); true

`‣ GeneralizedCodeNorm` ( C, subcode1, subscode2, ..., subcodek ) | ( function ) |

`GeneralizedCodeNorm`

returns the `k`-norm of `C` with respect to `k` subcodes.

gap> c := RepetitionCode( 7, GF(2) );; gap> ham := HammingCode( 3, GF(2) );; gap> d := EvenWeightSubcode( ham );; gap> e := ConstantWeightSubcode( ham, 3 );; gap> GeneralizedCodeNorm( ham, c, d, e ); 4

`‣ IsNormalCode` ( C ) | ( function ) |

`IsNormalCode`

returns `true' if `C` is normal. A code is called *normal* if the norm of the code is not more than two times the covering radius of the code plus one. Almost all codes are normal, however some (non-linear) abnormal codes have been found.

Often, it is difficult to find out whether a code is normal, because it involves computing the covering radius. However, `IsNormalCode`

uses much information from the literature (in particular, [GS85]) about normality for certain code parameters.

gap> IsNormalCode( HammingCode( 3, GF(2) ) ); true

In this section we describe several vector space functions **GUAVA** uses for constructing codes or performing calculations with codes.

In this section, some new miscellaneous functions are described, including weight enumerators, the MacWilliams-transform and affinity and almost affinity of codes.

`‣ CodeWeightEnumerator` ( C ) | ( function ) |

`CodeWeightEnumerator`

returns a polynomial of the following form:

\[ f(x) = \sum_{i=0}^{n} A_i x^i, \]

where \(A_i\) is the number of codewords in `C` with weight \(i\).

gap> CodeWeightEnumerator( ElementsCode( [ [ 0,0,0 ], [ 0,0,1 ], > [ 0,1,1 ], [ 1,1,1 ] ], GF(2) ) ); x^3 + x^2 + x + 1 gap> CodeWeightEnumerator( HammingCode( 3, GF(2) ) ); x^7 + 7*x^4 + 7*x^3 + 1

`‣ CodeDistanceEnumerator` ( C, w ) | ( function ) |

`CodeDistanceEnumerator`

returns a polynomial of the following form:

\[ f(x) = \sum_{i=0}^{n} B_i x^i, \]

where \(B_i\) is the number of codewords with distance \(i\) to `w`.

If `w` is a codeword, then `CodeDistanceEnumerator`

returns the same polynomial as `CodeWeightEnumerator`

.

gap> CodeDistanceEnumerator( HammingCode( 3, GF(2) ),[0,0,0,0,0,0,1] ); x^6 + 3*x^5 + 4*x^4 + 4*x^3 + 3*x^2 + x gap> CodeDistanceEnumerator( HammingCode( 3, GF(2) ),[1,1,1,1,1,1,1] ); x^7 + 7*x^4 + 7*x^3 + 1 # `[1,1,1,1,1,1,1]' $\in$ `HammingCode( 3, GF(2 ) )'

`‣ CodeMacWilliamsTransform` ( C ) | ( function ) |

`CodeMacWilliamsTransform`

returns a polynomial of the following form:

\[ f(x) = \sum_{i=0}^{n} C_i x^i, \]

where \(C_i\) is the number of codewords with weight \(i\) in the *dual* code of `C`.

gap> CodeMacWilliamsTransform( HammingCode( 3, GF(2) ) ); 7*x^4 + 1

`‣ CodeDensity` ( C ) | ( function ) |

`CodeDensity`

returns the *density* of `C`. The density of a code is defined as

\[ \frac{M \cdot V_q(n,t)}{q^n}, \]

where \(M\) is the size of the code, \(V_q(n,t)\) is the size of a sphere of radius \(t\) in \(GF(q^n)\) (which may be computed using `SphereContent`

), \(t\) is the covering radius of the code and \(n\) is the length of the code.

gap> CodeDensity( HammingCode( 3, GF(2) ) ); 1 gap> CodeDensity( ReedMullerCode( 1, 4 ) ); 14893/2048

`‣ SphereContent` ( n, t, F ) | ( function ) |

`SphereContent`

returns the content of a ball of radius `t` around an arbitrary element of the vectorspace \(F^n\). This is the cardinality of the set of all elements of \(F^n\) that are at distance (see `DistanceCodeword`

(3.6-2) less than or equal to `t` from an element of \(F^n\).

In the context of codes, the function is used to determine if a code is perfect. A code is *perfect* if spheres of radius \(t\) around all codewords partition the whole ambient vector space, where *t* is the number of errors the code can correct.

gap> SphereContent( 15, 0, GF(2) ); 1 # Only one word with distance 0, which is the word itself gap> SphereContent( 11, 3, GF(4) ); 4984 gap> C := HammingCode(5); a linear [31,26,3]1 Hamming (5,2) code over GF(2) #the minimum distance is 3, so the code can correct one error gap> ( SphereContent( 31, 1, GF(2) ) * Size(C) ) = 2 ^ 31; true

`‣ Krawtchouk` ( k, i, n, q ) | ( function ) |

`Krawtchouk`

returns the Krawtchouk number \(K_{k}(i)\). `q` must be a prime power, `n` must be a positive integer, `k` must be a non-negative integer less then or equal to `n` and `i` can be any integer. (See `KrawtchoukMat`

(7.3-1)). This number is the value at \(x=i\) of the polynomial

\[ K_k^{n,q}(x) =\sum_{j=0}^n (-1)^j(q-1)^{k-j}b(x,j)b(n-x,k-j), \]

where $b(v,u)=u!/(v!(v-u)!)$ is the binomial coefficient if $u,v$ are integers. For more properties of these polynomials, see [MS83].

gap> Krawtchouk( 2, 0, 3, 2); 3

`‣ PrimitiveUnityRoot` ( F, n ) | ( function ) |

`PrimitiveUnityRoot`

returns a primitive `n`-th root of unity in an extension field of `F`. This is a finite field element \(a\) with the property \(a^n=1\) in `F`, and `n` is the smallest integer such that this equality holds.

gap> PrimitiveUnityRoot( GF(2), 15 ); Z(2^4) gap> last^15; Z(2)^0 gap> PrimitiveUnityRoot( GF(8), 21 ); Z(2^6)^3

`‣ PrimitivePolynomialsNr` ( n, F ) | ( function ) |

`PrimitivePolynomialsNr`

returns the number of irreducible polynomials over \(F=GF(q)\) of degree `n` with (maximum) period \(q^n-1\). (According to a theorem of S. Golomb, this is \(\phi(p^n-1)/n\).)

See also the GAP function `RandomPrimitivePolynomial`

, `RandomPrimitivePolynomial`

(8.2-2).

gap> PrimitivePolynomialsNr(3,4); 12

`‣ IrreduciblePolynomialsNr` ( n, F ) | ( function ) |

`PrimitivePolynomialsNr`

returns the number of irreducible polynomials over \(F=GF(q)\) of degree `n`.

gap> IrreduciblePolynomialsNr(3,4); 20

`‣ MatrixRepresentationOfElement` ( a, F ) | ( function ) |

Here `F` is either a finite extension of the ``base field'' \(GF(p)\) or of the rationals \({\mathbb{Q}}\), and \(a\in F\). The command `MatrixRepresentationOfElement`

returns a matrix representation of `a` over the base field.

If the element `a` is defined over the base field then it returns the corresponding \(1\times 1\) matrix.

gap> a:=Random(GF(4)); 0*Z(2) gap> M:=MatrixRepresentationOfElement(a,GF(4));; Display(M); . gap> a:=Random(GF(4)); Z(2^2) gap> M:=MatrixRepresentationOfElement(a,GF(4));; Display(M); . 1 1 1

`‣ ReciprocalPolynomial` ( P ) | ( function ) |

`ReciprocalPolynomial`

returns the *reciprocal* of polynomial `P`. This is a polynomial with coefficients of `P` in the reverse order. So if \(P=a_0 + a_1 X + ... + a_{n} X^{n}\), the reciprocal polynomial is \(P'=a_{n} + a_{n-1} X + ... + a_0 X^{n}\).

This command can also be called using the syntax `ReciprocalPolynomial( P , n )`

. In this form, the number of coefficients of `P` is assumed to be less than or equal to \(n+1\) (with zero coefficients added in the highest degrees, if necessary). Therefore, the reciprocal polynomial also has degree \(n+1\).

gap> P := UnivariatePolynomial( GF(3), Z(3)^0 * [1,0,1,2] ); -x_1^3+x_1^2+Z(3)^0 gap> RecP := ReciprocalPolynomial( P ); x_1^3+x_1-Z(3)^0 gap> ReciprocalPolynomial( RecP ) = P; true gap> P := UnivariatePolynomial( GF(3), Z(3)^0 * [1,0,1,2] ); -x_1^3+x_1^2+Z(3)^0 gap> ReciprocalPolynomial( P, 6 ); x_1^6+x_1^4-x_1^3

`‣ CyclotomicCosets` ( q, n ) | ( function ) |

`CyclotomicCosets`

returns the cyclotomic cosets of \(q \pmod n\). `q` and `n` must be relatively prime. Each of the elements of the returned list is a list of integers that belong to one cyclotomic coset. A \(q\)-cyclotomic coset of \(s \pmod n\) is a set of the form \(\{s,sq,sq^2,...,sq^{r-1}\}\), where \(r\) is the smallest positive integer such that \(sq^r-s\) is \(0 \pmod n\). In other words, each coset contains all multiplications of the coset representative by \(q \pmod n\). The coset representative is the smallest integer that isn't in the previous cosets.

gap> CyclotomicCosets( 2, 15 ); [ [ 0 ], [ 1, 2, 4, 8 ], [ 3, 6, 12, 9 ], [ 5, 10 ], [ 7, 14, 13, 11 ] ] gap> CyclotomicCosets( 7, 6 ); [ [ 0 ], [ 1 ], [ 2 ], [ 3 ], [ 4 ], [ 5 ] ]

`‣ WeightHistogram` ( C[, h] ) | ( function ) |

The function `WeightHistogram`

plots a histogram of weights in code `C`. The maximum length of a column is `h`. Default value for `h` is \(1/3\) of the size of the screen. The number that appears at the top of the histogram is the maximum value of the list of weights.

gap> H := HammingCode(2, GF(5)); a linear [6,4,3]1 Hamming (2,5) code over GF(5) gap> WeightDistribution(H); [ 1, 0, 0, 80, 120, 264, 160 ] gap> WeightHistogram(H); 264---------------- * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * +--------+--+--+--+-- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

`‣ MultiplicityInList` ( L, a ) | ( function ) |

This is a very simple list command which returns how many times a occurs in L. It returns 0 if a is not in L. (The GAP command `Collected`

does not quite handle this "extreme" case.)

gap> L:=[1,2,3,4,3,2,1,5,4,3,2,1];; gap> MultiplicityInList(L,1); 3 gap> MultiplicityInList(L,6); 0

`‣ MostCommonInList` ( L ) | ( function ) |

Input: a list L

Output: an a in L which occurs at least as much as any other in L

gap> L:=[1,2,3,4,3,2,1,5,4,3,2,1];; gap> MostCommonInList(L); 1

`‣ RotateList` ( L ) | ( function ) |

Input: a list L

Output: a list L' which is the cyclic rotation of L (to the right)

gap> L:=[1,2,3,4];; gap> RotateList(L); [2,3,4,1]

`‣ CirculantMatrix` ( k, L ) | ( function ) |

Input: integer k, a list L of length n

Output: kxn matrix whose rows are cyclic rotations of the list L

gap> k:=3; L:=[1,2,3,4];; gap> M:=CirculantMatrix(k,L);; gap> Display(M);

In this section we describe several multivariate polynomial GAP functions **GUAVA** uses for constructing codes or performing calculations with codes.

`‣ MatrixTransformationOnMultivariatePolynomial ` ( A, f, R ) | ( function ) |

`A` is an \(n\times n\) matrix with entries in a field \(F\), `R` is a polynomial ring of \(n\) variables, say \(F[x_1,...,x_n]\), and `f` is a polynomial in `R`. Returns the composition \(f\circ A\).

`‣ DegreeMultivariatePolynomial` ( f, R ) | ( function ) |

This command takes two arguments, `f`, a multivariate polynomial, and `R` a polynomial ring over a field \(F\) containing `f`, say \(R=F[x_1,x_2,...,x_n]\). The output is simply the maximum degrees of all the monomials occurring in `f`.

This command can be used to compute the degree of an affine plane curve.

gap> F:=GF(11);; gap> R2:=PolynomialRing(F,2); PolynomialRing(..., [ x_1, x_2 ]) gap> vars:=IndeterminatesOfPolynomialRing(R2);; gap> x:=vars[1];; y:=vars[2];; gap> poly:=y^2-x*(x^2-1);; gap> DegreeMultivariatePolynomial(poly,R2); 3

`‣ DegreesMultivariatePolynomial` ( f, R ) | ( function ) |

Returns a list of information about the multivariate polynomial `f`. Nice for other programs but mostly unreadable by GAP users.

gap> F:=GF(11);; gap> R2:=PolynomialRing(F,2); PolynomialRing(..., [ x_1, x_2 ]) gap> vars:=IndeterminatesOfPolynomialRing(R2);; gap> x:=vars[1];; y:=vars[2];; gap> poly:=y^2-x*(x^2-1);; gap> DegreesMultivariatePolynomial(poly,R2); [ [ [ x_1, x_1, 1 ], [ x_1, x_2, 0 ] ], [ [ x_2^2, x_1, 0 ], [ x_2^2, x_2, 2 ] ], [ [ x_1^3, x_1, 3 ], [ x_1^3, x_2, 0 ] ] ]

`‣ CoefficientMultivariatePolynomial` ( f, var, power, R ) | ( function ) |

The command `CoefficientMultivariatePolynomial`

takes four arguments: a multivariant polynomial `f`, a variable name `var`, an integer `power`, and a polynomial ring `R` containing `f`. For example, if `f` is a multivariate polynomial in \(R\) = \(F\)[\(x_1,x_2,...,x_n\)] then `var` must be one of the \(x_i\). The output is the coefficient of \(x_i^{power}\) in `f`.

(Not sure if \(F\) needs to be a field in fact ...)

Related to the GAP command `PolynomialCoefficientsPolynomial`

.

gap> F:=GF(11);; gap> R2:=PolynomialRing(F,2); PolynomialRing(..., [ x_1, x_2 ]) gap> vars:=IndeterminatesOfPolynomialRing(R2);; gap> x:=vars[1];; y:=vars[2];; gap> poly:=y^2-x*(x^2-1);; gap> PolynomialCoefficientsOfPolynomial(poly,x); [ x_2^2, Z(11)^0, 0*Z(11), -Z(11)^0 ] gap> PolynomialCoefficientsOfPolynomial(poly,y); [ -x_1^3+x_1, 0*Z(11), Z(11)^0 ] gap> CoefficientMultivariatePolynomial(poly,y,0,R2); -x_1^3+x_1 gap> CoefficientMultivariatePolynomial(poly,y,1,R2); 0*Z(11) gap> CoefficientMultivariatePolynomial(poly,y,2,R2); Z(11)^0 gap> CoefficientMultivariatePolynomial(poly,x,0,R2); x_2^2 gap> CoefficientMultivariatePolynomial(poly,x,1,R2); Z(11)^0 gap> CoefficientMultivariatePolynomial(poly,x,2,R2); 0*Z(11) gap> CoefficientMultivariatePolynomial(poly,x,3,R2); -Z(11)^0

`‣ SolveLinearSystem` ( L, vars ) | ( function ) |

Input: `L` is a list of linear forms in the variables `vars`.

Output: the solution of the system, if its unique.

The procedure is straightforward: Find the associated matrix \(A\), find the "constant vector" \(b\), and solve \(A*v=b\). No error checking is performed.

Related to the GAP command `SolutionMat( A, b )`

.

gap> F:=GF(11);; gap> R2:=PolynomialRing(F,2); PolynomialRing(..., [ x_1, x_2 ]) gap> vars:=IndeterminatesOfPolynomialRing(R2);; gap> x:=vars[1];; y:=vars[2];; gap> f:=3*y-3*x+1;; g:=-5*y+2*x-7;; gap> soln:=SolveLinearSystem([f,g],[x,y]); [ Z(11)^3, Z(11)^2 ] gap> Value(f,[x,y],soln); # checking okay 0*Z(11) gap> Value(g,[x,y],col); # checking okay 0*Z(11)

`‣ GuavaVersion` ( ) | ( function ) |

Returns the current version of Guava. Same as `guava\_version()`

.

gap> GuavaVersion(); "3.11"

`‣ ZechLog` ( x, b, F ) | ( function ) |

Returns the Zech log of x to base b, ie the i such that $x+1=b^i$, so $y+z=y(1+z/y)=b^k$, where k=Log(y,b)+ZechLog(z/y,b) and b must be a primitive element of F.

gap> F:=GF(11);; l := One(F);; gap> ZechLog(2*l,8*l,F); -24 gap> 8*l+l;(2*l)^(-24); Z(11)^6 Z(11)^6

`‣ CoefficientToPolynomial` ( coeffs, R ) | ( function ) |

The function `CoefficientToPolynomial`

returns the degree \(d-1\) polynomial \(c_0+c_1x+...+c_{d-1}x^{d-1}\), where `coeffs` is a list of elements of a field, \(coeffs=\{ c_0,...,c_{d-1}\}\), and `R` is a univariate polynomial ring.

gap> F:=GF(11); GF(11) gap> R1:=PolynomialRing(F,["a"]);; gap> var1:=IndeterminatesOfPolynomialRing(R1);; a:=var1[1];; gap> coeffs:=Z(11)^0*[1,2,3,4]; [ Z(11)^0, Z(11), Z(11)^8, Z(11)^2 ] gap> CoefficientToPolynomial(coeffs,R1); Z(11)^2*a^3+Z(11)^8*a^2+Z(11)*a+Z(11)^0

`‣ DegreesMonomialTerm` ( m, R ) | ( function ) |

The function `DegreesMonomialTerm`

returns the list of degrees to which each variable in the multivariate polynomial ring `R` occurs in the monomial `m`, where `coeffs` is a list of elements of a field.

gap> F:=GF(11); GF(11) gap> R1:=PolynomialRing(F,["a"]);; gap> var1:=IndeterminatesOfPolynomialRing(R1);; a:=var1[1];; gap> b:=X(F,"b",var1); b gap> var2:=Concatenation(var1,[b]); [ a, b ] gap> R2:=PolynomialRing(F,var2); PolynomialRing(..., [ a, b ]) gap> c:=X(F,"c",var2); c gap> var3:=Concatenation(var2,[c]); [ a, b, c ] gap> R3:=PolynomialRing(F,var3); PolynomialRing(..., [ a, b, c ]) gap> m:=b^3*c^7; b^3*c^7 gap> DegreesMonomialTerm(m,R3); [ 0, 3, 7 ]

`‣ DivisorsMultivariatePolynomial` ( f, R ) | ( function ) |

The function `DivisorsMultivariatePolynomial`

returns the list of polynomial divisors of `f` in the multivariate polynomial ring `R` with coefficients in a field. This program uses a simple but slow algorithm (see Joachim von zur Gathen, Jürgen Gerhard, [vzGG03], exercise 16.10) which first converts the multivariate polynomial `f` to an associated univariate polynomial \(f^*\), then `Factors`

\(f^*\), and finally converts these univariate factors back into the multivariate polynomial factors of `f`. Since `Factors`

is non-deterministic, `DivisorsMultivariatePolynomial`

is non-deterministic as well.

gap> R2:=PolynomialRing(GF(3),["x1","x2"]); GF(3)[x1,x2] gap> vars:=IndeterminatesOfPolynomialRing(R2); [ x1, x2 ] gap> x2:=vars[2]; x2 gap> x1:=vars[1]; x1 gap> f:=x1^3+x2^3;; gap> DivisorsMultivariatePolynomial(f,R2); [ x1+x2, x1+x2, x1+x2 ]

generated by GAPDoc2HTML